Hunt’s ‘Mid-Term Budget’ Gives With One Hand…

A personal view on the Budget by Prof Stephen Barber
March 6, 2024

It was only four months ago that Chan­cel­lor Hunt cut Nation­al Insur­ance by 2p in a move intend­ed to pla­cate his right wing and pave the way for elec­toral recov­ery. In the weeks that fol­lowed, the polls bare­ly flick­ered, it became clear that the tax bur­den had risen to pay for a head­line cut, and Britain slipped into reces­sion. 

Today he repeat­ed the trick with anoth­er 2p cut in NI, paid for with some tin­ker­ing and a ‘fox shoot­ing’ abo­li­tion of non-Dom sta­tus (a key Labour pro­pos­al).  There is a dan­ger here that with the pri­or­i­ty of achiev­ing a tax cut there is too lit­tle strate­gic think­ing around the tax ris­es risk­ing an unrav­el­ling in scruti­ny. Accord­ing to the OBR, tax as a pro­por­tion of GDP remains at an 80 year high. 

It is a shame that the only mea­sure that seems to mat­ter to the gov­ern­ment is whether the Bud­get will shore up the Tory vote or at least wrong foot the next Labour Chan­cel­lor. Because the real­i­ty is that tax cuts and invest­ment into pub­lic ser­vices (which vot­ers cur­rent­ly pri­ori­tise) would be more deliv­er­able were we enjoy­ing stronger, or any, eco­nom­ic growth. 

Unfor­tu­nate­ly Britain has endured more than a decade of near stag­na­tion, weak out­put, and low pro­duc­tiv­i­ty growth. And while there are ele­ments of this envi­ron­ment that econ­o­mists debate, there is undoubt­ed­ly polit­i­cal fail­ure at its heart. Pol­i­tics has been inward-look­ing and self-serv­ing for at least 8 years. Jump­ing from one pop­ulist notion to the next, the uncer­tain­ty has not been con­ducive to busi­ness. Brex­it has dam­aged the econ­o­my and there has been an absence of eco­nom­ic strat­e­gy to dri­ve invest­ment. And this is per­haps one rea­son that Hunt acts more like a Chan­cel­lor in a new admin­is­tra­tion than one grap­pling with the mess of his own party’s cre­ation at the fag-end of a Par­lia­ment. 

The excite­ment in the Cham­ber and the rhetor­i­cal flair told us this was a pre-elec­tion Bud­get. Nev­er­the­less, this is a small Bud­get in con­tent with­out a com­mand­ing set piece. It is more like a mid-term event than the tri­umphant cul­mi­na­tion of a sound eco­nom­ic strat­e­gy. Hunt lacked the eco­nom­ic growth, the income and lee­way with­in his self-imposed rules to do much else. It is not the Bud­get that his already muti­nous back­benchers real­ly want­ed, so many of whom will be out of a job before the year is out. 

It is with­in that ‘mid-term Bud­get’ that some of the more inter­est­ing announce­ments can be found. Fund­ing for med­ical research and tech­nol­o­gy, green indus­tries, and house build­ing. Else­where there is a new British ISA to strength­en invest­ment in UK com­pa­nies. 

This will be lit­tle con­so­la­tion for Tory MPs and their cheer­lead­ers in the press, con­vinced that tax cuts are the polit­i­cal panacea for their unpop­u­lar­i­ty. With polling show­ing the gov­ern­ment as unpop­u­lar as the moment Liz Truss and Kwasi Kwatang crashed the econ­o­my, there is no obvi­ous route back. And it’s alarm­ing that a hard­core group thinks the answer is to repeat this cat­a­stroph­ic plan.  

What does this mean for the tim­ing of the elec­tion? One school of thought says that if Sunak push­es it to the back end of the year, there might just be time for one more fis­cal event In the Autumn State­ment to buy back vot­ers as the econ­o­my improves. But with the knives out the PM could try to head off the blood­shed with an ear­ly poll in May. He will prob­a­bly try to cling on, but only time will tell.